GCSE Paper 1 -
2004 Questions and Mark Scheme
@ IvoHistory
Jump to:
The Emergence of Modern China, 1911-76 - Questions or
Mark Scheme
Superpower Relations, 1945-90 - Questions or
Mark Scheme
|
Answer ONE question only from
this section. Choose either Question 1 or Question 2. You must
answer Part (a) and Part (b) of the question you choose. |
|||||
| 1. |
(a) |
Part (a) of this question is
about China in the years 1911-34. The photograph below shows two
warlords with Chiang Kaishek. Look at the photograph and answer all
the questions which follow. |
|||
| (i) | What is meant by the
term ‘warlord’? |
(3) | |||
| (ii) | Describe the key
features of life in China under the warlords. |
(5) |
|||
| (iii) | Why did the May 4th
Movement (1919) begin? |
(5) | |||
| (iv) |
Why did the Chinese
Communist Party suffer setbacks in the years 1927-34? |
(7) | |||
|
(Total 20 marks)
|
|||||
| (b) | Part (b) of this
question is about China in the years 1949-66. |
||||
| (i) | In what ways did
life in China change in the years 1949-59? You may use the following information to help you with your answer.
|
(15) | |||
| (ii) |
Why did Mao Zedong
introduce the Cultural Revolution in 1966? |
(10) | |||
|
(Total for Part (a) and Part (b): 45 marks) |
|||||
| 2. |
(a) |
If you have answered Question 1
do NOT answer Question 2. Part (a) of
this question is about China after 1949. The photograph shows a
steelworks in Manchuria. Look at the photograph below and answer all
the questions which follow. |
|||
| (i) | What is meant by the
term ‘Five-Year Plan’? |
(3) | |||
| (ii) | Why did Mao Zedong
end the ‘One Hundred Flowers’ campaign? |
(5) |
|||
| (iii) | Why did Mao Zedong
introduce the policy of collectivisation? |
(5) | |||
| (iv) | Describe the key
features of the Great Leap Forward. |
(7) | |||
|
(Total 20 marks)
|
|||||
| (b) | Part (b) of this
question is about China in the years 1911-45. |
||||
| (i) | Describe the key
features of the unrest in China in the years 1911-27.
You may use the following information to help you with your answer.
|
(15) | |||
| (ii) | Why did the Chinese
Communist Party win the support of many peasants in the years
1934-45? |
(10) | |||
|
(Total for Part (a) and Part (b): 45 marks) |
|||||
| 1. | (a) (i) |
What is meant by
the term ‘warlord’? |
|
| Target: | Key
features/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. military ruler of China
after the revolution. |
(1) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, controlled an
area of China, no real limit to power, esp. after Yuan Shikai. |
(2-3) | |
| (a) (ii) | Describe the key
features of life in China under the warlords. |
||
| Target: | Key
features/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. chaotic and lawless. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, areas under
savage military control, high taxation, peasants forced into their
armies |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, time of wars between the warlords, tremendous cruelty. |
(5) | |
| (a) (iii) | Why did the May
4th Movement (1919) begin? |
||
| Target: |
Analysis of causation/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. it was a protest against
the peace treaties of 1919. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, China
disappointed that Kiaochow not returned, Japan did not withdraw the
21 demands. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, China felt betrayed as an ally, antipathy towards Japan great. |
(5) | |
|
(a) (iv) |
Why did the Chinese Communist Party suffer setbacks in the years 1927-34? | ||
| Target: | Analysis of
causation/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. Guomindang
attacked and killed supporters - Shanghai. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, GMD killed
many - forced CCP into the countryside - Chiang appeared to have
secured power in China, sought to eradicate the CCP. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, Chiang’s quest continued with the extermination
campaigns - 1930-4, Chiang and Seeckt’s methods to remove the CCP.
|
(6-7) | |
|
(b) (i) |
In what ways did
life in China change in the years 1949-59? |
||
| Target: | Change/recall of
knowledge (AO1) N.B. No credit for use of scaffold unless amplified. |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. describes the stimuli or
makes a general statement about changing nature of life. Spells,
punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with some accuracy; uses a
limited range of specialist terms appropriately. |
(1-4) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as Level 1, details
of the stimuli, or brings in other knowledge - peasant life changed
by communes, collectives and in the urban centres, education opened
opportunities. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with
some accuracy; uses a range of specialist terms with facility. |
(5-8) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected knowledge, e.g. as
L2, and begins to see the links between the stimuli
- may also use additional own knowledge. Sees the imprint of Mao’s
policies, discusses the role of women. Spells, punctuates and uses
the rules of grammar with considerable accuracy; shows some variety
of expression; uses a broad range of specialist terms with facility. |
(9-12) | |
| Level 4: | Developed
exposition supported by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3, clear analysis of the stimuli and sees the factors behind change,
may also use additional own knowledge. Is likely to go beyond basic
stimuli either by sharp-focused development of them or by selecting
other factors. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with
considerable accuracy, deploys a range of grammatical constructions
with some sense of style, uses a broad range of specialist terms
adeptly and with precision. |
(13-15) | |
|
(b) (ii) |
Why did Mao
Zedong introduce the Cultural Revolution in 1966? |
||
| Target: | Analysis of
causation/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: |
Simple statement
about causes supported by some knowledge e.g. Mao sought to recover
his position and strengthen it. Spells, punctuates and uses the
rules of grammar with general accuracy; uses a range of specialist
terms appropriately. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: |
Developed
statements about the causes supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as
L1, Mao opposed the moderates — did not wish to take the capitalist
road in spite of failures. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of
grammar with general accuracy; uses a range of specialist terms with
facility. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: |
Developed
explanation of the causes supported by appropriately selected
knowledge e.g. as L2, sees notion of continuing the Communist
Revolution, fear of the USA. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules
of grammar with considerable accuracy; shows some variety of
expression; uses a broad range of specialist terms with facility. |
(6-8) | |
| Level 4: |
Sustained
argument supported by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3, sees
the CR in terms of political and social control, Mao seeking to
regain position, propagandising the young to help him. Spells,
punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with considerable accuracy,
deploys a range of grammatical constructions with some sense of
style; uses a broad range of specialist terms adeptly and with
precision. |
(9-10) |
|
| 2. | (a) (i) |
What is meant by the term
‘Five-Year Plan’? |
|
| Target: | Key
features/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: |
Simple statements supported by
some knowledge e.g. attempt to modernise China in 5 years. |
(1) | |
| Level 2: |
Developed statements supported
by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, develop the economy - esp. heavy
industry (light industry neglected) |
(2-3) | |
| (a) (ii) |
Why did Mao Zedong end the
‘One Hundred Flowers’ campaign? |
||
| Target: | Analysis of causation/recall
of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: |
Simple statements supported by
some knowledge e.g. Mao unhappy with criticism. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: |
Developed statements supported
by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, criticism became quite extensive,
some of it seemed pointed at him rather than communist policies. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, as a consequence Mao ended it, also thought that Mao had
discovered his true enemies and was able to remove them. |
(5) | |
| (a) (iii) | Why did Mao
Zedong introduce the policy of collectivisation? |
||
| Target: |
Analysis of causation/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. saw agriculture as the
foundation of communist China - give peasants some interest in land
cultivation. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, encourage
peasants to work together - increase production, and win support
simultaneously. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, Mao also keen to avoid the creation of a wealthy peasant class. |
(5) | |
|
(a) (iv) |
Describe the
key features of the Great Leap Forward |
||
| Target: | Key
features/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. attempt to develop light
and heavy industry simultaneously, increases and issues. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, based on the
commune, common ownership, every activity controlled by the commune,
rise in production etc. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: | Developed explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as L2, majority of pop. in communes, propaganda campaigns, backyard steel, problems - steel and also farming - starvation.
|
(6-7) | |
|
(b) (i) |
Describe the
key features of the unrest in China in the years 1911-27. |
||
| Target: | Key
features/recall of knowledge (AO1) N.B. No credit for use of scaffold unless amplified. |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. describes the stimuli or
makes a general statement about the unrest. Spells, punctuates and
uses the rules of grammar with some accuracy; uses a limited range
of specialist terms appropriately. |
(1-4) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. details of the
stimuli, or brings in other knowledge - revolution, Sun and Yuan
vied for control, chaos under the warlords. Spells, punctuates and
uses the rules of grammar with some accuracy; uses a range of
specialist terms with facility. |
(5-8) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
exposition supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as L2, and begins to see the links between the stimuli - may also use
additional own knowledge, rule of warlords and dissatisfaction with
Versailles leads to student movements, CCP. Spells, punctuates and
uses the rules of grammar with considerable accuracy; shows some
variety of expression; uses a broad range of specialist terms with
facility. |
(9-12) | |
| Level 4: | Sustained
argument supported by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3, and
makes effective links between the issues to develop the argument -
may also use additional own knowledge. Sees issues as ongoing, GMD
as ally of CCP and then enemy after 1927. Spells, punctuates and
uses the rules of grammar with considerable accuracy, deploys a
range of grammatical constructions with some sense of style, uses a
broad range of specialist terms adeptly and with precision. |
(13-15) | |
|
(b) (ii) |
Why did the
Chinese Communist Party win the support of many peasants in the
years 1934-45? |
||
| Target: | Analysis of
causation/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: | Simple statement
about changes supported by some knowledge e.g. treated them well,
humanely. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with
general accuracy; uses a range of specialist terms appropriately. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements about the changes supported by relevant knowledge as L1, war with Japan forced Chiang to retreat - seemed not to care for
many Chinese or China - lost support. Spells, punctuates and uses
the rules of grammar with general accuracy; uses a range of
specialist terms with facility. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation of the changes supported by appropriately selected
knowledge e.g. as L2, Mao able to take some of China conquered by
Japan, consolidated support - Three All Campaign. Spells, punctuates
and uses the rules of grammar with considerable accuracy; shows some
variety of expression; uses a broad range of specialist terms with
facility. |
(6-8) | |
| Level 4: |
Developed
exposition supported by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3.
Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with considerable
accuracy, deploys a range of grammatical constructions with some
sense of style; uses a broad range of specialist terms adeptly and
with precision. |
(9-10) |
|
| 3. | (a) (i) |
What is meant by the term
‘Warsaw Pact’? |
|
| Target: | Key
features/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. communist alliance |
(1) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, military — in
response to NATO - USSR plus its E. European satellites. |
(2-3) | |
| (a) (ii) | Why did the
Soviet Union invade Hungary in 1956? |
||
| Target: | Analysis of
causation/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. Hungary trying to leave
Warsaw Pact. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, Nagy trying
to break the yoke of Soviet domination - promised free elections
etc. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, Khrushchev’s hardening attitude, fear of break up of Warsaw
Pact. |
(5) | |
| (a) (iii) | Why was there
a crisis between the Superpowers over Berlin in 1961? |
||
| Target: |
Analysis of causation/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. Berlin Wall constructed. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, huge numbers
of E. Berliners and E. Germans leaving - brain drain, hole in the
Iron Curtain. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, Khrushchev’s motives in wishing to bully Kennedy. |
(5) | |
|
(a) (iv) |
Describe the key
features of the Cuban Missile Crisis (1962). |
||
| Target: | Key features/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: | <<Unavailable>> |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | <<Unavailable>> |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: | <<Unavailable>>
|
(6-7) | |
|
(b) (i) |
Why did
relations between the USA and the USSR change in the years 1945-49? |
||
| Target: | Analysis of
causation/recall of
knowledge (AO1) N.B. No credit for use of scaffold unless amplified. |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. describes the stimuli or
makes a general statement about changing relations. Spells,
punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with some accuracy; uses a
limited range of specialist terms appropriately. |
(1-4) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. details of the
stimuli, or brings in other knowledge - Truman Doctrine - Bizonia.
Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with some accuracy;
uses a range of specialist terms with facility. |
(5-8) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected knowledge as L2, and
begins to see the links between the stimuli - sees fears of the West
after Soviet occupation, leading to economic issues and then
Blockade to the split via NATO, may also use additional own
knowledge. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with
considerable accuracy; shows some variety of expression; uses a
broad range of specialist terms with facility |
(9-12) | |
| Level 4: | Sustained
argument supported by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3, Soviet reactions — groups, growing tension, Soviet atomic bomb -
clear analysis of the stimuli and sees the factors behind change,
may also use additional own knowledge. Spells, punctuates and uses
the rules of grammar with considerable accuracy, deploys a range of
grammatical constructions with some sense of style, uses a broad
range of specialist terms adeptly and with precision. |
(13-15) | |
|
(b) (ii) |
In what ways did relations
between the USA and the USSR change in the years 1980-85? |
||
| Target: | Analysis of
causation/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: |
Simple statement about changes
supported by some knowledge e.g. continued to worsen after the
invasion of Afghanistan and SALT 2 not ratified. Spells, punctuates
and uses the rules of grammar with general accuracy; uses a range of
specialist terms appropriately. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: |
Developed statements about the
changes supported by relevant knowledge as L1, boycott of the
Olympic Games and the election of Reagan heightened the situation.
Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with general
accuracy; uses a range of specialist terms with facility. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: |
Developed explanation of the
changes supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as L2, arms race and SDI continued to worsen relations, optimism with new
Soviet leaders cut short. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of
grammar with considerable accuracy; shows some variety of
expression; uses a broad range of specialist terms with facility. |
(6-8) | |
| Level 4: |
Developed exposition supported
by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3, advent of Gorbachev, his
intentions within the SU and general optimism lead to a thaw then
warming of relations. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of
grammar with considerable accuracy, deploys a range of grammatical
constructions with some sense of style; uses a broad range of
specialist terms adeptly and with precision. |
(9-10) |
|
| 4. | (a) (i) |
What is meant by the term
'Marshall Plan’? |
|
| Target: | Key
features/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: |
Simple statements supported by
some knowledge e.g. money from USA to Europe after the war. |
(1) | |
| Level 2: |
Developed statements supported
by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, help economic recovery, prevent
spread of communism, apply Truman Doctrine. |
(2-3) | |
| (a) (ii) |
Why was the Truman Doctrine
issued in 1947? |
||
| Target: | Analysis of causation/recall
of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: |
Simple statements supported by
some knowledge e.g. stop the spread of communism. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: |
Developed statements supported
by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, events in Greece, spread of
communism in Greece, Br. withdrawal. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, context of Europe post-45 and US fears. |
(5) | |
| (a) (iii) | Why did
Stalin decide to blockade Berlin in 1948? |
||
| Target: |
Analysis of causation/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. formation of Bizonia,
success of western zones. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1 new currency,
support of the West in Berlin. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, secure the western enclave, strengthen USSR’s hand, continue
acquisition of territory. |
(5) | |
|
(a) (iv) |
Describe the
key features of the Hungarian Uprising (1956). |
||
| Target: | Key
features/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. Khrushchev ordered
troops in - threat to withdraw from Warsaw Pact. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, Hungary
opposed communism a la Stalin, influence of de-Stalinisation speech. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, Nagy replaced, no outside interference, SU overran Hungary,
c30,000 deaths, Khrushchev kept tight rein on Hungary.
|
(6-7) | |
|
(b) (i) |
Why did
relations between the USA and the USSR change in the years 1962-79? |
||
| Target: | Analysis of
causation/recall of knowledge (AO1) N.B. No credit for use of scaffold unless amplified. |
||
| Level 1: |
Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. describes the stimuli or
makes a general statement about changing relations. Spells,
punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with some accuracy; uses a
limited range of specialist terms appropriately. |
(1-4) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, details of
the stimuli, or brings in other knowledge - worsen during the CMC -
threat of nuclear war, improve after - hotline, Test Ban Treaty. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with some accuracy;
uses a range of specialist terms with facility. |
(5-8) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected knowledge as L2, and
begins to see the links between the stimuli may also use additional
own knowledge — beginnings of détente - SALT and Human Rights —
indication of improvement. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of
grammar with considerable accuracy; shows some variety of
expression; uses a broad range of specialist terms with facility. |
(9-12) | |
| Level 4: | Sustained
argument supported by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3, clear
analysis of the stimuli and sees the factors behind change, may also
use additional own knowledge - 1979 invasion worsened - ended
détente and US failed to ratify SALT 2 Overview - as a period of
fluctuation. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with
considerable accuracy, deploys a range of grammatical constructions
with some sense of style, uses a broad range of specialist terms
adeptly and with precision. |
(13-15) | |
|
(b) (ii) |
In what ways
did relations between USA and USSR change in the years 1985-90? |
||
| Target: | Change/recall of knowledge (AO1) |
||
| Level 1: | Simple statement
about changes supported by some knowledge e.g. meetings, summits,
photo opportunities. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of
grammar with general accuracy; uses a range of specialist terms
appropriately. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements about the changes supported by relevant knowledge as L1,
personal relationship, Gorbachev’s policies of ‘glasnost’ and
‘perestroika’. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with
general accuracy; uses a range of specialist terms with facility. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation of the changes supported by appropriately selected
knowledge e.g. as L2, ending the war in Afghanistan, Reagan’s softer
approach. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with
considerable accuracy; shows some variety of expression; uses a
broad range of specialist terms with facility. |
(6-8) | |
| Level 4: |
Developed
exposition supported by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3,
INF, threats evaporated. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of
grammar with considerable accuracy, deploys a range of grammatical
constructions with some sense of style; uses a broad range of
specialist terms adeptly and with precision. |
(9-10) |
|
All questions and mark schemes on this page taken from Edexcel (London Qualifications Limited). Questions and mark schemes copyright of Edexcel.