GCSE Paper 1 -
2005 Questions and Mark Scheme
@ IvoHistory
Jump to:
The Emergence of Modern China, 1911-76 - Questions or
Mark Scheme
Superpower Relations, 1945-90 - Questions or
Mark Scheme
|
Answer ONE question only from
this section. Choose either Question 1 or Question 2. You must
answer Part (a) and Part (b) of the question you choose. |
|||||
| 1. |
(a) |
Part (a) of this question is
about China in the years 1949-76. The photograph below shows a
People's Court. Look at the photograph and answer all
the questions that follow. |
|||
| (i) | What was meant by
the term ‘People's Court’? |
(3) | |||
| (ii) | Why did Mao Zedong
try to change the organisation of industry in China in the years
after 1949? |
(5) |
|||
| (iii) | Why did Mao Zedong
introduce the Cultural Revolution in 1966? |
(5) | |||
| (iv) |
Describe the key features of
life in China during the Cultural Revolution. |
(7) | |||
|
(Total 20 marks)
|
|||||
| (b) | Part (b) of this
question is about China in the years 1916-49. |
||||
| (i) | Why
was there unrest in China in the years after the death of Yuan Shi
Kai (1916) to the Northern Expedition (1927)? |
(10) | |||
| (ii) |
In what ways did support for the Chinese
Communist Party change in the years from the Northern Expedition
(1927) to its victory in the civil war (1949)? You may use the following information to help you with your answer.
|
(15) | |||
|
(Total for Part (a) and Part (b): 45 marks) |
|||||
| 2. |
(a) |
If you have answered Question 1
do NOT answer Question 2. Part (a) of
this question is about China in the years 1911 to 1935. Study the
text below and answer all the questions that follow.
|
|||
| (i) | What is meant by the
term ‘Three Principles of the People’? |
(3) | |||
| (ii) | Why did the May 4th
Movement begin in Chin in 1919? |
(5) |
|||
| (iii) | Why was the
Communist Party able to win the support of many of the Chinese
people in the 1920s? |
(5) | |||
| (iv) | Describe the key
features of the Long March (1934-35). |
(7) | |||
|
(Total 20 marks)
|
|||||
| (b) | Part (b) of this
question is about China in the years after 1949. |
||||
| (i) | In what ways did Mao
Zedong maintain the control over the people of China in the 1950s
and early 1960s?
You may use the following information to help you with your answer.
|
(15) | |||
| (ii) | Why were many of Mao
Zedong's industrial policies unsuccessful in the 1950s and 1960s? |
(10) | |||
|
(Total for Part (a) and Part (b): 45 marks) |
|||||
| 1. | (a) (i) |
What was meant by
the term ‘People's Court’? |
|
| Target: | Key features/recall of
knowledge |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. peasants able to
denounce the landlords. |
(1) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, set up to
secure the support of the peasants, peasants secured land. |
(2-3) | |
| (a) (ii) | Why did Mao Zedong
try to change the organisation of industry in China in the years
after 1949? |
||
| Target: | Key
features/recall of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. introduction of 5
Year Plans. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, develops
idea of the Great Leap Forward - rapid progress - 'walking on two
legs', role of the communes. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, acceptance of problems in CR - continued stress on heavy
industry, moves to autarky. |
(5) | |
| (a) (iii) | Why did Mao Zedong
introduce the Cultural Revolution in 1966? |
||
| Target: | Causation/recall
of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. re-assert his
position as leader. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, attempt to
ensure the revolution was not diluted, remained of the people. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, remove some of the CCP officials, remove Western ideas.. |
(5) | |
|
(a) (iv) |
Describe the key features of
life in China during the Cultural Revolution. |
||
| Target: | Causation/recall
of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. resulted in deaths,
brought chaos. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1,
higher education was paralysed, role of the Red Guard. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, use of Mao's book, internecine war in the party, reduction of
the RG's powerand return to normality.
|
(6-7) | |
|
(b) (i) |
Why was there unrest in China in the years after the death of Yuan Shi Kai (1916) to the Northern Expedition (1927)? | ||
| Target: |
Causation/recall of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: | Simple statement
about causes supported by some knowledge e.g. rise of the
warlords. Spells,
punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with general accuracy; uses a
range of specialist terms appropriately. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements about the causes supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1,
impact of the FWW. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with
general accuracy; uses a range of specialist terms with facility. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation of the causes supported by appropriately selected knowledge, e.g. as
L2, issues just before the death of Yuan, no overall leader, weak
army. Spells, punctuates and uses
the rules of grammar with considerable accuracy; shows some variety
of expression; uses a broad range of specialist terms with facility. |
(6-8) | |
| Level 4: | Developed
exposition supported by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3,
fighting continued until GMD and CCPcombine to eradicate the chaos -
the attacks on the warlords end in problems for CCP. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with
considerable accuracy, deploys a range of grammatical constructions
with some sense of style, uses a broad range of specialist terms
adeptly and with precision. |
(9-10) | |
|
(b) (ii) |
In what ways did support for the Chinese
Communist Party change in the years from the Northern Expedition
(1927) to its victory in the civil war (1949)? |
||
| Target: | Key features/recall of knowledge
N.B. No credit will be given for copying
stimulus material without elaboration. |
||
| Level 1: |
Simple statements supported by
some knowledge e.g. describes the stimuli or makes a general
statement about the developing party but major setback with the
Shanghai incident. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of
grammar with some accuracy; uses a limited range of specialist terms
appropriately. |
(1-4) | |
| Level 2: |
Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. details of the
stimuli - split with GMD, attempt to marginalise, or brings in other
knowledge - confidence of GMD, retreat of the CCP. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of
grammar with some accuracy; uses a range of specialist terms with
facility. |
(5-8) | |
| Level 3: |
Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected
knowledge e.g. as L2, and begins to see the links between the
stimuli, strength of Mao, impact of the Long March and acquisition
of support for CCP - role of Mao. May also use additional own
knowledge - issue of the war with Japan emerging. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules
of grammar with considerable accuracy; shows some variety of
expression; uses a broad range of specialist terms with facility. |
(9-12) | |
| Level 4: |
Sustained
argument supported by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3,
clear analysis of the stimuli and see the factors behind
development, may also use additional own knowledge. Is likely to go
beyond basic stimuli either by sharp/focused development of them or
by selecting other factors - able to see weaknesses of GMD as
advantageous to CCP. Spells,
punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with considerable accuracy,
deploys a range of grammatical constructions with some sense of
style; uses a broad range of specialist terms adeptly and with
precision. |
(13-15) |
|
| 2. | (a) (i) |
What is meant by the
term ‘Three Principles of the People’? |
|
| Target: | Key features/recall of
knowledge |
||
| Level 1: |
Simple statements supported by
some knowledge e.g. Nationalism, socialism and democracy. |
(1) | |
| Level 2: |
Developed statements supported
by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, ensure foreigners were not
allowed primacy, ensure that all Chinese were involved and root out
poverty by means of socialism. |
(2-3) | |
| (a) (ii) |
Why did the May 4th
Movement begin in Chin in 1919? |
||
| Target: | Causation/recall of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: |
Simple statements supported by
some knowledge e.g. disappointment with the Treaty of Versailles
- Japan still dominated China. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: |
Developed statements supported
by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, Japan allowed to retain
Kiaochow and Shantung. Students demonstrated against the decisions
in Europe. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, Chinese government weak - had not withstood the Allies. |
(5) | |
| (a) (iii) | Why was the
Communist Party able to win the support of many of the Chinese
people in the 1920s? |
||
| Target: | Causation/recall
of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. CCP helped to
organise the workers in places - how to strike etc. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, peasants
given ideas on how to challenge landowners - popularity of CCP
increases. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, Peasant Associations, trade unions feel progress made - role of
Mao as instigator.. |
(5) | |
|
(a) (iv) |
Describe the key features of the Long March (1934-35). | ||
| Target: | Key
features/recall of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. Mao and CCP besieged
blockhouses - decision to trek to Shensi. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, constant
attacks, crossed rivers, Luting Bridge, mountains. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: | Developed explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as L2, travelled 6,000 miles, many battles, only 20,000 out of 100,000 survived, CCP survived, won support of peasants.
|
(6-7) | |
|
(b) (i) |
In what ways did Mao Zedong maintain the control over the people of China in the 1950s and early 1960s? | ||
| Target: | Key
features/recall of knowledge
N.B. No credit will be given for copying
stimulus material without elaboration. |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. describes the stimuli or
makes a general statement. Spells, punctuates and
uses the rules of grammar with some accuracy; uses a limited range
of specialist terms appropriately. |
(1-4) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. details of the
stimuli, or brings in other knowledge - fear, severe rule e.g.
landlords. Spells, punctuates and
uses the rules of grammar with some accuracy; uses a range of
specialist terms with facility. |
(5-8) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as L2, and begins to see the links between the stimuli -
control, all sections of society touched - may also use
additional own knowledge - much was seen as improvement on the old
life. Spells, punctuates and
uses the rules of grammar with considerable accuracy; shows some
variety of expression; uses a broad range of specialist terms with
facility. |
(9-12) | |
| Level 4: | Sustained
argument supported by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3, and
makes effective links between the issues to develop the argument -
may also use additional own knowledge. Use of party, control of
nationalities, may end with Cultural Revolution. Spells, punctuates and
uses the rules of grammar with considerable accuracy, deploys a
range of grammatical constructions with some sense of style, uses a
broad range of specialist terms adeptly and with precision. |
(13-15) | |
|
(b) (ii) |
Why were many of Mao
Zedong's industrial policies unsuccessful in the 1950s and 1960s? |
||
| Target: | Causation/recall
of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: | Simple statement
about causes supported by some knowledge e.g. poor quality steel
in the backyard furnaces. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with
general accuracy; uses a range of specialist terms appropriately. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements about the causes supported by relevant knowledge as L1,
withdrawal of Soviet help hampered progress, Soviet Union had
charged high interest on loans. Spells, punctuates and uses
the rules of grammar with general accuracy; uses a range of
specialist terms with facility. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation of the causes supported by appropriately selected
knowledge e.g. as L2, eschewed modern western methods, relying on
mass labour - not efficient. Spells, punctuates
and uses the rules of grammar with considerable accuracy; shows some
variety of expression; uses a broad range of specialist terms with
facility. |
(6-8) | |
| Level 4: |
Developed
exposition supported by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3,
failure to invest in new machinery, lack of linked planning across
industries.
Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with considerable
accuracy, deploys a range of grammatical constructions with some
sense of style; uses a broad range of specialist terms adeptly and
with precision. |
(9-10) |
|
| 3. | (a) (i) |
Give ONE reason to
explain why there was a crisis over Berlin in 1961. |
|
| Target: | Causation/recall of
knowledge |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. the wall built to
stop refugees moving from the east to the west. |
(1) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, tested
Kennedy, Khrushchev angry at events over Cuba, U2. |
(2-3) | |
| (a) (ii) | In what ways did
relations between the USA and USSR improve in the years 1963-69? |
||
| Target: | Key features/recall of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. hot-line and detente. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, partial
Test-Ban Treaty, grain sales - feeling of optimism. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, SALT begins in 1969 - despite issues over Czechoslovakia and
Vietnam. |
(5) | |
| (a) (iii) |
Describe the key features of
the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) in the 1970s. |
||
| Target: |
Key features/recall of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. first SALT ratified -
second failed because of the invasion of Afghanistan. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, SALT 1
limited increase in number of nuclear missiles and 5 year delay on
the building of more missiles. ABMs restricted by separate
agreement. SALT did not cover multiple warhead missiles or
battlefield weapons. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, SALT 2 began in 1975 and lasted for 4 years - agreements reached
on strategic weapons, but talks not ratified. |
(5) | |
|
(a) (iv) |
Why did relations
between the USA and the USSR worsen in the years 1980-85? |
||
| Target: | Causation/recall of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: | Single
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. USSR refused to pull
out of Afghanistan. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, US
responses showed situation worsen - grain exports stopped and 1980
Olympics boycotted. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g.
as L2, Reagan - 'evil empire', Star Wars and failure of START
exacerbated the situation. Leadership in USSR weak and there was
discontinuity.
|
(6-7) | |
|
(b) (i) |
In what ways did relations change between the USA and the USSR in the years 1945-56? | ||
| Target: | Key
features/change/recall of knowledge
N.B. No credit will be given for copying
stimulus material without elaboration. |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. describes the stimuli or
makes a general statement about changing relations. Spells,
punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with some accuracy; uses a
limited range of specialist terms appropriately. |
(1-4) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. details of the
stimuli, or brings in other knowledge. Soviet control in Eastern
Europe.
Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with some accuracy;
uses a range of specialist terms with facility. |
(5-8) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as L2, and
begins to see the links between the stimuli, may also use additional own
knowledge - Hungary and the Suez crisis. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with
considerable accuracy; shows some variety of expression; uses a
broad range of specialist terms with facility |
(9-12) | |
| Level 4: | Sustained
argument supported by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3, clear analysis of the stimuli and sees the factors behind change,
may also use additional own knowledge. Spells, punctuates and uses
the rules of grammar with considerable accuracy, deploys a range of
grammatical constructions with some sense of style, uses a broad
range of specialist terms adeptly and with precision. |
(13-15) | |
|
(b) (ii) |
Why did
relations between the USA and the USSR change in the years 1985-90? |
||
| Target: | Causation/recall
of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: |
Simple statement about changes
supported by some knowledge e.g. Gorbachev the new leader of the
Soviet Union. Spells, punctuates
and uses the rules of grammar with general accuracy; uses a range of
specialist terms appropriately. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: |
Developed statements about the
changes supported by relevant knowledge e.g as L1, Gorbachev
willing to make changes, role of Reagan.
Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with general
accuracy; uses a range of specialist terms with facility. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: |
Developed explanation of the
changes supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as L2,
sees Gorbachev's policies as key to change, even Reagan seeking to
reduce arms spending. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of
grammar with considerable accuracy; shows some variety of
expression; uses a broad range of specialist terms with facility. |
(6-8) | |
| Level 4: |
Developed exposition supported
by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3, summit meetings, INF,
feelings of optimism, Gorbachev ended conflict in Afghanistan,
Gorbachev's attitude to Eastern Europe encouraging in the
development of better relations. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of
grammar with considerable accuracy, deploys a range of grammatical
constructions with some sense of style; uses a broad range of
specialist terms adeptly and with precision. |
(9-10) |
|
| 4. | (a) (i) |
Give ONE reason to
explain why the Allies met at Yalta in 1945. |
|
| Target: | Causation/recall of
knowledge |
||
| Level 1: |
Simple statements supported by
some knowledge e.g. decide the fate of Germany. |
(1) | |
| Level 2: |
Developed statements supported
by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, plan the final attack on
Germany, work out details of the occupation, ensure no recurrence as
after Versailles. |
(2-3) | |
| (a) (ii) |
Describe the key
features of the Potsdam Conference (1945). |
||
| Target: | Key features/recall
of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: |
Simple statements supported by
some knowledge e.g. Germany and Berlin divided into 4 zones. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: |
Developed statements supported
by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, war trials, Germany to be de-Nazified. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, decisions on the government to be taken jointly, reparations,
free elections in Germany. |
(5) | |
| (a) (iii) | Why did the USA help
the countries of Western Europe in the years 1945-48? |
||
| Target: |
Causation/recall of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. sent money via
Marshall Plan to help economies. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, expands on
Marshall Plan, protection via Truman Doctrine to contain communism. |
(3-4) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, assistance to western zones of Germany in the blockade,
assistance to Greece and Turkey. Creation of prosperity to block
threat of USSR. |
(5) | |
|
(a) (iv) |
In what ways did the
Cold War develop in the years 1949-56? |
||
| Target: | Key
features/recall of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. alliances formed -
NATO and Warsaw Pact. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1, Berlin
Blockade soured relations, division of Germany exacerbated the
position. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanations supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as
L2, sees the development of the Cold War - Hungary and Suez.
|
(6-7) | |
|
(b) (i) |
In what ways did the Cuban
Missile Crisis change relations between the USA and the USSR in the
1960s? |
||
| Target: | Change/recall of knowledge |
||
| Level 1: |
Simple
statement about changes supported by some knowledge e.g.
initially worsened - almost brought war. Spells,
punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with general accuracy; uses a range of specialist terms appropriately. |
(1-2) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements about the changes supported by relevant knowledge e.g. as L1,
then general improvement in the decade - detente - SALT at the end
of the decade. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with
general accuracy;
uses a range of specialist terms with facility. |
(3-5) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation of the changes supported by appropriately selected knowledge
e.g. as L2, hot-line and the Partial Test Ban Treaty, grain
sales. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of
grammar with considerable accuracy; shows some variety of
expression; uses a broad range of specialist terms with facility. |
(6-8) | |
| Level 4: | Developed
exposition supported by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3,
sees that issue of nuclear war recedes - Vietnam, Israel, and
Czechoslovakia created no major crisis. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with
considerable accuracy; deploys a range of grammatical constructions
with some sense of style; uses a broad range of specialist terms
adeptly and with precision. |
(9-10) | |
|
(b) (ii) |
Why did relations between the USA and the USSR change in the years 1980-90? |
||
| Target: | Causation/recall of knowledge
N.B. No credit will be given for copying
stimulus material without elaboration. |
||
| Level 1: | Simple
statements supported by some knowledge e.g. describes the stimuli or
makes a general statement about changing relations. Spells,
punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with some accuracy; uses a
limited range of specialist terms appropriately. |
(1-4) | |
| Level 2: | Developed
statements supported by relevant knowledge e.g. details of the
stimuli, or brings in other knowledge - failure of SALT 2, deadlock
in START.
Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with some accuracy;
uses a range of specialist terms with facility. |
(5-8) | |
| Level 3: | Developed
explanation supported by appropriately selected knowledge e.g. as L2, and
begins to see the links between the stimuli, may also use additional own
knowledge - leadership in Soviet Union weak, internal issues. Spells, punctuates and uses the rules of grammar with
considerable accuracy; shows some variety of expression; uses a
broad range of specialist terms with facility |
(9-12) | |
| Level 4: |
Sustained
argument supported by precisely selected knowledge e.g. as L3, clear analysis of the stimuli and sees the factors behind change,
may also use additional own knowledge to give overview - summits,
INF. Spells, punctuates and uses
the rules of grammar with considerable accuracy, deploys a range of
grammatical constructions with some sense of style, uses a broad
range of specialist terms adeptly and with precision. |
(13-15) |
|
All questions and mark schemes on this page taken from Edexcel (London Qualifications Limited). Questions and mark schemes copyright of Edexcel.